JD
Price
$30.91
Change
-$0.29 (-0.93%)
Updated
Sep 4, 02:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
44.84B
70 days until earnings call
LQDT
Price
$26.62
Change
+$0.25 (+0.95%)
Updated
Sep 4, 02:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
823.72M
103 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

JD vs LQDT

Header iconJD vs LQDT Comparison
Open Charts JD vs LQDTBanner chart's image
JD.com
Price$30.91
Change-$0.29 (-0.93%)
Volume$337
Capitalization44.84B
Liquidity Services
Price$26.62
Change+$0.25 (+0.95%)
Volume$410
Capitalization823.72M
JD vs LQDT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JD vs. LQDT commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JD is a StrongBuy and LQDT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (JD: $31.20 vs. LQDT: $26.37)
Brand notoriety: JD: Notable vs. LQDT: Not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JD: 93% vs. LQDT: 81%
Market capitalization -- JD: $44.84B vs. LQDT: $823.72M
JD [@Internet Retail] is valued at $44.84B. LQDT’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $823.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.41T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $50.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLQDT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LQDT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JD is a better buy in the long-term than LQDT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LQDT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LQDT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the short-term than JD.

Price Growth

JD (@Internet Retail) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while LQDT (@Internet Retail) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

JD is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

LQDT is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-1.22% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JD($44.8B) has a higher market cap than LQDT($824M). LQDT has higher P/E ratio than JD: LQDT (31.77) vs JD (8.71). JD YTD gains are higher at: -7.356 vs. LQDT (-18.334). JD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.7B vs. LQDT (41.9M). JD has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. LQDT (167M). LQDT has less debt than JD: LQDT (14.2M) vs JD (101B). JD has higher revenues than LQDT: JD (1.27T) vs LQDT (466M).
JDLQDTJD / LQDT
Capitalization44.8B824M5,437%
EBITDA49.7B41.9M118,616%
Gain YTD-7.356-18.33440%
P/E Ratio8.7131.7727%
Revenue1.27T466M271,459%
Total Cash214B167M128,144%
Total Debt101B14.2M711,268%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JD vs LQDT: Fundamental Ratings
JD
LQDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1281
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
5057
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6159
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JD's Valuation (26) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LQDT (75) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that JD’s stock grew somewhat faster than LQDT’s over the last 12 months.

LQDT's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JD (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LQDT’s stock grew somewhat faster than JD’s over the last 12 months.

JD's SMR Rating (50) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as LQDT (57) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that JD’s stock grew similarly to LQDT’s over the last 12 months.

LQDT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as JD (60) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LQDT’s stock grew similarly to JD’s over the last 12 months.

LQDT's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as JD (61) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LQDT’s stock grew similarly to JD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JDLQDT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WENCX39.99N/A
N/A
Allspring Mid Cap Growth Fund - Cl C
BIECX25.37N/A
N/A
Brandes International Equity C
TSCGX18.48-0.01
-0.05%
Thrivent Small Cap Growth S
CRIEX7.39-0.01
-0.14%
CRM All Cap Value Inst
SMVSX27.84-0.13
-0.46%
Invesco Small Cap Value R6

JD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JD has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JD jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JD
1D Price
Change %
JD100%
-1.20%
BABA - JD
75%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
PDD - JD
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
VIPS - JD
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
BZUN - JD
46%
Loosely correlated
+6.33%
RERE - JD
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
More

LQDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LQDT and SE have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LQDT and SE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQDT
1D Price
Change %
LQDT100%
+0.96%
SE - LQDT
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
DIBS - LQDT
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVLV - LQDT
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.31%
JD - LQDT
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
YJ - LQDT
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
More