Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JCVSX vs RMEBX
JCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts JCVSX vs RMEBX
JHancock Classic Value R2
Price$24.77
Change-$0.29 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.7M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
JCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JCVSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. JCVSX (570M). JCVSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: JCVSX (2.40) vs RMEBX (1.05). JCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: JCVSX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). JCVSX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. JCVSX (29.00). JCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: JCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. JCVSX (-31.32). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. JCVSX (-6.23).
| JCVSX | RMEBX | JCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.07 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.07 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.593 | 14.940 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 1.05 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | -31.32 | 6.55 | -479% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.86 | 30.03 | -109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.23 | 53.80 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.30 | 92.20 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers