Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JCVCX vs RMFCX
JCVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts JCVCX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value C
Price$24.62
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets626.85M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
JCVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JCVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JCVCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. JCVCX (627M). JCVCX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: JCVCX (1.86) vs RMFCX (1.27). JCVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: JCVCX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). JCVCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. JCVCX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCVCX: RMFCX (250) vs JCVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. JCVCX (-25.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. JCVCX (11.74).
| JCVCX | RMFCX | JCVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.91 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.91 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.077 | 9.596 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 627M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.27 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.31 | 11.47 | -221% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.18 | 29.27 | -96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.74 | 61.83 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.33 | 79.21 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement