Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JCLCX vs PACAX
JCLCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JCLCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv C
Price$12.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets588.47M
JCLCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JCLCX vs. PACAX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JCLCX is a Hold and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JCLCX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. PACAX (588M). PACAX pays higher dividends than JCLCX: PACAX (3.15) vs JCLCX (2.97). JCLCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JCLCX (20 years) vs PACAX (32 years). JCLCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JCLCX (16.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCLCX: PACAX (0) vs JCLCX (1000). PACAX (6.29) and JCLCX (6.01) have marching annual gain over last year. PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.10 vs. JCLCX (6.02).
| JCLCX | PACAX | JCLCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.00 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.00 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.400 | 9.155 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 588M | 269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 3.15 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.01 | 6.29 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 29.02 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.02 | 11.10 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.72 | 28.41 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement