Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JCCIX vs NAESX
JCCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts JCCIX vs NAESX
JHancock Small Cap Core I
Price$15.54
Change-$0.35 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.00
Change-$1.80 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
JCCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JCCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JCCIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. JCCIX (2.28B). NAESX pays higher dividends than JCCIX: NAESX (1.35) vs JCCIX (0.10). JCCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: JCCIX (11 years) vs NAESX (65 years). JCCIX (0.99) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). JCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCCIX: NAESX (3000) vs JCCIX (250000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. JCCIX (-0.93). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. JCCIX (37.82).
| JCCIX | NAESX | JCCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.17 | 576% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.546 | -4.390 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 3000 | 8,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 148B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 1.35 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.93 | 5.19 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.06 | 31.28 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.82 | 63.19 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.16 | 92.88 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement