Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JBAWX vs RLBAX
JBAWX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts JBAWX vs RLBAX
JHancock Balanced R6
Price$32.69
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.34B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$39.31
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.11B
JBAWX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JBAWX vs. RLBAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JBAWX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 271B vs. JBAWX (6.34B). JBAWX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: JBAWX (1.81) vs RLBAX (1.07). JBAWX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: JBAWX (14 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than JBAWX (0.63). JBAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JBAWX: RLBAX (250) vs JBAWX (1000000). JBAWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. RLBAX (8.44). JBAWX return over 5 years is better than : 46.53 vs. RLBAX (34.78).
| JBAWX | RLBAX | JBAWX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.31 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.966 | 15.776 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.34B | 271B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.07 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.15 | 8.44 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.23 | 37.26 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.53 | 34.78 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.96 | 66.67 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers