JACK
Price
$16.83
Change
-$0.46 (-2.66%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
317.17M
39 days until earnings call
RRGB
Price
$5.50
Change
-$0.07 (-1.26%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
97.64M
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

JACK vs RRGB

Header iconJACK vs RRGB Comparison
Open Charts JACK vs RRGBBanner chart's image
Jack In The Box
Price$16.83
Change-$0.46 (-2.66%)
Volume$1.06M
Capitalization317.17M
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
Price$5.50
Change-$0.07 (-1.26%)
Volume$196.87K
Capitalization97.64M
JACK vs RRGB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JACK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JACK vs. RRGB commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JACK is a Buy and RRGB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (JACK: $16.83 vs. RRGB: $5.50)
Brand notoriety: JACK and RRGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JACK: 111% vs. RRGB: 16%
Market capitalization -- JACK: $317.17M vs. RRGB: $97.64M
JACK [@Restaurants] is valued at $317.17M. RRGB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $97.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JACK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRRGB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JACK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RRGB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JACK is a better buy in the long-term than RRGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JACK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRGB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JACK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RRGB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JACK is a better buy in the short-term than RRGB.

Price Growth

JACK (@Restaurants) experienced а -2.43% price change this week, while RRGB (@Restaurants) price change was +10.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

JACK is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

RRGB is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JACK($317M) has a higher market cap than RRGB($97.6M). RRGB YTD gains are higher at: 0.182 vs. JACK (-59.008). RRGB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.8M vs. JACK (-80.07M). RRGB has more cash in the bank: 24.2M vs. JACK (15.8M). RRGB has less debt than JACK: RRGB (544M) vs JACK (3.15B). JACK has higher revenues than RRGB: JACK (1.53B) vs RRGB (1.25B).
JACKRRGBJACK / RRGB
Capitalization317M97.6M325%
EBITDA-80.07M13.8M-580%
Gain YTD-59.0080.182-32,395%
P/E Ratio9.34N/A-
Revenue1.53B1.25B122%
Total Cash15.8M24.2M65%
Total Debt3.15B544M578%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JACK vs RRGB: Fundamental Ratings
JACK
RRGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5488
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9337
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8697
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JACK's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (83). This means that JACK’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

JACK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RRGB (100). This means that JACK’s stock grew similarly to RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

JACK's SMR Rating (1) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (100). This means that JACK’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

RRGB's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JACK (93). This means that RRGB’s stock grew somewhat faster than JACK’s over the last 12 months.

JACK's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RRGB (97). This means that JACK’s stock grew similarly to RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JACKRRGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JACK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAIDF10.880.45
+4.27%
Baidu, Inc.
ACCMF14.46N/A
N/A
AAC CLYDE SPACE AB
JELCF2.70N/A
N/A
Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.
IQAIF0.02N/A
N/A
Imaging Biometrics Ltd
IMPUY8.64-0.50
-5.47%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.

JACK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JACK has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JACK jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JACK
1D Price
Change %
JACK100%
-2.66%
DIN - JACK
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.66%
RICK - JACK
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
DENN - JACK
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
WEN - JACK
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
CBRL - JACK
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.98%
More

RRGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRGB has been loosely correlated with RICK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RRGB jumps, then RICK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRGB
1D Price
Change %
RRGB100%
-1.26%
RICK - RRGB
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
YUM - RRGB
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
JACK - RRGB
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
TXRH - RRGB
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
CBRL - RRGB
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.98%
More