Advertisement
J vs MTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is J is a Buy and MTZ is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
J’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- J’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
J’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- J’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
J (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +2.82% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +6.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
J is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+1.88% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| J | MTZ | J / MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 16.1B | 17.6B | 91% |
| EBITDA | 927M | 1.04B | 89% |
| Gain YTD | 3.654 | 64.169 | 6% |
| P/E Ratio | 52.76 | 53.21 | 99% |
| Revenue | 12B | 13.8B | 87% |
| Total Cash | 1.24B | 231M | 535% |
| Total Debt | 2.71B | 2.77B | 98% |
J | MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
J's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as MTZ (85) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that J’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as J (34) in the null industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to J’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's SMR Rating (67) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as J (79) in the null industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to J’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as J (54) in the null industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to J’s over the last 12 months.
J's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTZ (96) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that J’s stock grew significantly faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| J | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 47% | 9 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| REMX | 76.13 | 1.24 | +1.66% |
| VanEck Rare Earth & Strat Mtls ETF | |||
| IGME | 27.27 | 0.29 | +1.06% |
| Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| EIRL | 74.33 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | |||
| YFYA | 9.90 | N/A | -0.05% |
| Yields for You Strategy A ETF | |||
| TSLR | 37.41 | -0.08 | -0.21% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | |||
J and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, J has been closely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if J jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 86% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 81% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| STRL - MTZ | 78% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| PRIM - MTZ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| EME - MTZ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||