Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IYW vs NBDS
IYW vs NBDS Comparison
Open Charts IYW vs NBDS
iShares US Technology ETF
Price$185.49
Change+$2.59 (+1.42%)
Volume$1.92K
Net Assets23.36B
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Price$34.80
Change+$0.42 (+1.22%)
Volume$1K
Net Assets25.32M
IYW vs NBDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IYW vs. NBDS commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYW is a Hold and NBDS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 23.4B vs. NBDS (25.3M). NBDS (15.525) and IYW (14.776) have matching annual dividend yield . IYW was incepted earlier than NBDS: IYW (25 years) vs NBDS (3 years). IYW (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than NBDS (0.55). NBDS has a higher turnover IYW (7.00) vs IYW (7.00).
| IYW | NBDS | IYW / NBDS | |
| Gain YTD | 14.776 | 15.525 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 23.4B | 25.3M | 92,490% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.55 | 71% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 49.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IYW | NBDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | 12 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IYW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been loosely correlated with GTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then GTM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYW | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| GTM - IYW | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| CTSH - IYW | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
| SNDK - IYW | 26% Poorly correlated | +6.59% | ||
| WOLF - IYW | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.05% | ||
| NTNX - IYW | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.91% | ||
More | ||||
NBDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBDS has been loosely correlated with ARM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NBDS jumps, then ARM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBDS | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| ARM - NBDS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| HOOD - NBDS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| NVMI - NBDS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| AVGO - NBDS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| HUBS - NBDS | 60% Loosely correlated | -6.43% | ||
More | ||||