IXJ | XHS | IXJ / XHS | |
Gain YTD | 0.383 | 12.338 | 3% |
Net Assets | 3.73B | 74.6M | 5,003% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
Turnover | 5.00 | 37.00 | 14% |
Yield | 1.57 | 0.28 | 560% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
IXJ | XHS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago80% | 3 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 11 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXJ has been closely correlated with TMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXJ jumps, then TMO could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that XHS and UNH have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XHS and UNH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
XHS | 100% | +1.71% | ||
UNH - XHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
MD - XHS | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
SEM - XHS | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
RDNT - XHS | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
LFST - XHS | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.14% | ||
More |