IXHL
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.01 (+2.56%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:41 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
134.09M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SWDCF
Price
$3.87
Change
+$0.27 (+7.50%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Capitalization
646.03M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IXHL vs SWDCF

Header iconIXHL vs SWDCF Comparison
Open Charts IXHL vs SWDCFBanner chart's image
Incannex Healthcare
Price$0.40
Change+$0.01 (+2.56%)
Volume$41.72K
Capitalization134.09M
SWEDENCARE AB
Price$3.87
Change+$0.27 (+7.50%)
Volume$4.08K
Capitalization646.03M
IXHL vs SWDCF Comparison Chart in %
IXHL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SWDCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IXHL vs. SWDCF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IXHL is a Hold and SWDCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (IXHL: $0.39 vs. SWDCF: $3.87)
Brand notoriety: IXHL and SWDCF are both not notable
IXHL represents the Pharmaceuticals: Generic, while SWDCF is part of the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IXHL: 49% vs. SWDCF: 86%
Market capitalization -- IXHL: $134.09M vs. SWDCF: $646.03M
IXHL [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $134.09M. SWDCF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $646.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $65.17B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $245.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $4.59B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IXHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IXHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SWDCF is a better buy in the long-term than IXHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IXHL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWDCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IXHL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SWDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IXHL is a better buy in the short-term than SWDCF.

Price Growth

IXHL (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while SWDCF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.20%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +113.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-0.60% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.47% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWDCF($646M) has a higher market cap than IXHL($134M). IXHL YTD gains are higher at: 8.575 vs. SWDCF (0.000). SWDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 494M vs. IXHL (-47.3M). SWDCF has more cash in the bank: 145M vs. IXHL (73.3M). IXHL has less debt than SWDCF: IXHL (210K) vs SWDCF (1.73B). SWDCF has higher revenues than IXHL: SWDCF (2.68B) vs IXHL (12K).
IXHLSWDCFIXHL / SWDCF
Capitalization134M646M21%
EBITDA-47.3M494M-10%
Gain YTD8.5750.000-
P/E RatioN/A91.58-
Revenue12K2.68B0%
Total Cash73.3M145M51%
Total Debt210K1.73B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IXHLSWDCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IXHL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SWDCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGNT0.02N/A
+7.82%
Totaligent Inc.
PTXKY5.230.14
+2.69%
PT XLSMART Telecom Sejahtera Tbk
TRUMY14.300.03
+0.21%
Terumo Corp.
ITGDF1.00N/A
N/A
INTEGRAL DIAGNOSTICS LTD
BLGO0.18N/A
-0.52%
BioLargo, Inc.

IXHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXHL has been loosely correlated with INM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IXHL jumps, then INM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IXHL
1D Price
Change %
IXHL100%
+2.07%
INM - IXHL
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
ESPR - IXHL
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
NBIX - IXHL
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.32%
HROW - IXHL
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
YCBD - IXHL
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
More

SWDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWDCF and OHCFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWDCF and OHCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWDCF
1D Price
Change %
SWDCF100%
N/A
OHCFF - SWDCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVSI - SWDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+13.49%
IXHL - SWDCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
EAPIF - SWDCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALVO - SWDCF
0%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
More