IXC | PWER | IXC / PWER | |
Gain YTD | 5.986 | 10.550 | 57% |
Net Assets | 1.74B | 6.67M | 26,041% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.81 | 51% |
Turnover | 8.00 | 55.00 | 15% |
Yield | 3.93 | 1.40 | 281% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 2 years | - |
IXC | PWER | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago50% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago87% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 8 days ago57% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXC has been closely correlated with FANG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXC jumps, then FANG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IXC | 100% | +0.84% | ||
FANG - IXC | 90% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
COP - IXC | 89% Closely correlated | +2.18% | ||
SHEL - IXC | 89% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
XOM - IXC | 88% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
EOG - IXC | 86% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PWER and HBM have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PWER and HBM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWER | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PWER | 100% | N/A | ||
HBM - PWER | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
AA - PWER | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.07% | ||
FCX - PWER | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
GNRC - PWER | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
ERO - PWER | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
More |