It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTREE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TREE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
IX (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +3.31% price change this week, while TREE (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +29.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +82.89%.
IX is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
TREE is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
IX | TREE | IX / TREE | |
Capitalization | 26.2B | 664M | 3,946% |
EBITDA | N/A | 74.2M | - |
Gain YTD | 8.679 | 26.606 | 33% |
P/E Ratio | 11.00 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.88T | 972M | 193,210% |
Total Cash | N/A | 126M | - |
Total Debt | 6.51T | 567M | 1,147,443% |
IX | TREE | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IX's Valuation (17) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for TREE (97). This means that IX’s stock grew significantly faster than TREE’s over the last 12 months.
IX's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for TREE (100). This means that IX’s stock grew significantly faster than TREE’s over the last 12 months.
IX's SMR Rating (1) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for TREE (97). This means that IX’s stock grew significantly faster than TREE’s over the last 12 months.
TREE's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as IX (49). This means that TREE’s stock grew similarly to IX’s over the last 12 months.
IX's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TREE (100). This means that IX’s stock grew somewhat faster than TREE’s over the last 12 months.
IX | TREE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago37% | 3 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago60% | 4 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago46% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago49% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago70% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FICIX | 14.35 | 0.12 | +0.84% |
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl R6 | |||
IRLSX | 78.80 | 0.34 | +0.43% |
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Idx Port S | |||
RYSOX | 96.61 | 0.38 | +0.39% |
Rydex S&P 500 A | |||
LEGAX | 77.16 | 0.30 | +0.39% |
Columbia Large Cap Growth A | |||
ZIFIX | 11.97 | -0.03 | -0.25% |
American Beacon Ninety One Int Frn R5 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IX has been loosely correlated with VOYA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IX jumps, then VOYA could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TREE has been loosely correlated with HTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TREE jumps, then HTH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TREE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TREE | 100% | -2.54% | ||
HTH - TREE | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
VOYA - TREE | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
IX - TREE | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
TLGUF - TREE | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ATMCU - TREE | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |