IWSH
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.92M
SLAMF
Price
$11.57
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
166.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWSH vs SLAMF

Header iconIWSH vs SLAMF Comparison
Open Charts IWSH vs SLAMFBanner chart's image
Wright Investors' Service Holdings
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$194
Capitalization3.92M
Slam
Price$11.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$113
Capitalization166.83M
IWSH vs SLAMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IWSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IWSH vs. SLAMF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWSH is a Hold and SLAMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (IWSH: $0.19 vs. SLAMF: $11.57)
Brand notoriety: IWSH and SLAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IWSH: 3% vs. SLAMF: 36%
Market capitalization -- IWSH: $3.92M vs. SLAMF: $166.83M
IWSH [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $3.92M. SLAMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $166.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $174.23M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IWSH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IWSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLAMF is a better buy in the long-term than IWSH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IWSH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLAMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IWSH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLAMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLAMF is a better buy in the short-term than IWSH.

Price Growth

IWSH (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -17.39% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.64% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLAMF($167M) has a higher market cap than IWSH($3.92M). SLAMF YTD gains are higher at: 1.938 vs. IWSH (-13.636). IWSH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.07M vs. SLAMF (-1.97M). IWSH has more cash in the bank: 1.86M vs. SLAMF (66). IWSH (0) and SLAMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
IWSHSLAMFIWSH / SLAMF
Capitalization3.92M167M2%
EBITDA-1.07M-1.97M54%
Gain YTD-13.6361.938-704%
P/E RatioN/A144.63-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.86M662,815,152%
Total DebtN/A14.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IWSH: Fundamental Ratings
IWSH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWSHSLAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
5%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IWSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSMAX12.810.17
+1.34%
Hartford Small Cap Value A
IRMCX10.690.11
+1.04%
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S
FAPKX13.100.12
+0.92%
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future C
DCCCX24.970.21
+0.85%
Macquarie Small Cap Core C
BRXRX16.130.02
+0.12%
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R1

IWSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IWSH and SLAMF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IWSH and SLAMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWSH
1D Price
Change %
IWSH100%
N/A
SLAMF - IWSH
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBT - IWSH
12%
Poorly correlated
+28.34%
SITS - IWSH
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - IWSH
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCRI - IWSH
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More