IWSH
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.02 (+10.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.54M
SLAMF
Price
$11.57
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
166.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWSH vs SLAMF

Header iconIWSH vs SLAMF Comparison
Open Charts IWSH vs SLAMFBanner chart's image
Wright Investors' Service Holdings
Price$0.22
Change+$0.02 (+10.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization4.54M
Slam
Price$11.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$339
Capitalization166.83M
IWSH vs SLAMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IWSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IWSH vs. SLAMF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWSH is a Hold and SLAMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (IWSH: $0.22 vs. SLAMF: $11.57)
Brand notoriety: IWSH and SLAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IWSH: 173% vs. SLAMF: 13%
Market capitalization -- IWSH: $4.54M vs. SLAMF: $166.83M
IWSH [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $4.54M. SLAMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $166.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.03M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IWSH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IWSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLAMF is a better buy in the long-term than IWSH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IWSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLAMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IWSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLAMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IWSH and SLAMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IWSH (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +10.00% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.12% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLAMF($167M) has a higher market cap than IWSH($4.54M). SLAMF YTD gains are higher at: 1.938 vs. IWSH (0.000). IWSH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.07M vs. SLAMF (-1.97M). IWSH has more cash in the bank: 1.86M vs. SLAMF (66). IWSH (0) and SLAMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
IWSHSLAMFIWSH / SLAMF
Capitalization4.54M167M3%
EBITDA-1.07M-1.97M54%
Gain YTD0.0001.938-
P/E RatioN/A144.63-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.86M662,815,152%
Total DebtN/A14.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IWSH: Fundamental Ratings
IWSH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWSHSLAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IWSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CING3.900.11
+2.90%
Cingulate Inc
GERN1.400.02
+1.45%
Geron Corp
KRYS150.270.52
+0.35%
Krystal Biotech
KR67.75-0.09
-0.13%
Kroger Co (The)
KG25.84-0.15
-0.58%
Kestrel Group Ltd

IWSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IWSH and SLAMF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IWSH and SLAMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWSH
1D Price
Change %
IWSH100%
+10.00%
SLAMF - IWSH
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBT - IWSH
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SITS - IWSH
11%
Poorly correlated
+11.69%
TGLO - IWSH
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.48%
TCRI - IWSH
5%
Poorly correlated
+16.67%
More

SLAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAMF has been loosely correlated with KACLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLAMF jumps, then KACLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLAMF
1D Price
Change %
SLAMF100%
N/A
KACLF - SLAMF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
MNTN - SLAMF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
PEGR - SLAMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRRX - SLAMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IWSH - SLAMF
17%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
More