IWSH
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.89M
SITS
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWSH vs SITS

Header iconIWSH vs SITS Comparison
Open Charts IWSH vs SITSBanner chart's image
Wright Investors' Service Holdings
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization2.89M
Southern ITS International
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$68.13K
Capitalization4.84M
IWSH vs SITS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IWSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SITS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IWSH vs. SITS commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWSH is a Hold and SITS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (IWSH: $0.15 vs. SITS: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: IWSH and SITS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IWSH: 184% vs. SITS: 88%
Market capitalization -- IWSH: $2.89M vs. SITS: $4.84M
IWSH [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $2.89M. SITS’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $4.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IWSH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSITS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IWSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SITS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SITS is a better buy in the long-term than IWSH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IWSH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SITS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IWSH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SITS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SITS is a better buy in the short-term than IWSH.

Price Growth

IWSH (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SITS (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -5.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.67% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SITS($4.84M) has a higher market cap than IWSH($2.89M). SITS YTD gains are higher at: -1.747 vs. IWSH (-31.818).
IWSHSITSIWSH / SITS
Capitalization2.89M4.84M60%
EBITDA-1.23MN/A-
Gain YTD-31.818-1.7471,822%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash3.97MN/A-
Total Debt53KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IWSH vs SITS: Fundamental Ratings
IWSH
SITS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SITS's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as IWSH (66). This means that SITS’s stock grew similarly to IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

SITS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IWSH (100). This means that SITS’s stock grew similarly to IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

IWSH's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SITS (100). This means that IWSH’s stock grew similarly to SITS’s over the last 12 months.

SITS's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as IWSH (63). This means that SITS’s stock grew similarly to IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

SITS's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IWSH (100). This means that SITS’s stock grew similarly to IWSH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWSHSITS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IWSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SITS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INBX16.330.59
+3.75%
Inhibrx Biosciences Inc.
BLX40.830.47
+1.16%
Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior SA
BNS55.350.22
+0.40%
Bank of Nova Scotia
SLM33.870.07
+0.21%
SLM Corp
SOHO0.93N/A
+0.01%
Sotherly Hotels

IWSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IWSH and SLAMF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IWSH and SLAMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWSH
1D Price
Change %
IWSH100%
N/A
SLAMF - IWSH
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBT - IWSH
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SITS - IWSH
11%
Poorly correlated
-13.46%
TGLO - IWSH
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCRI - IWSH
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SITS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SITS and IWSH have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SITS and IWSH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SITS
1D Price
Change %
SITS100%
-13.46%
IWSH - SITS
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCMC - SITS
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTLK - SITS
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - SITS
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLTYF - SITS
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More