Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWS vs TMDV
IWS vs TMDV Comparison
Open Charts IWS vs TMDV
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
Price$131.52
Change+$0.37 (+0.28%)
Volume$301.53K
Net Assets14.09B
ProShares Russell US Dividend Grwr ETF
Price$46.15
Change-$1.21 (-2.55%)
Volume$486
Net Assets4.2M
IWS vs TMDV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWS vs. TMDV commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWS is a Buy and TMDV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWS has more net assets: 14.1B vs. TMDV (4.2M). IWS has a higher annual dividend yield than TMDV: IWS (2.438) vs TMDV (-0.922). IWS was incepted earlier than TMDV: IWS (24 years) vs TMDV (6 years). IWS (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than TMDV (0.35). TMDV has a higher turnover IWS (19.00) vs IWS (19.00).
| IWS | TMDV | IWS / TMDV | |
| Gain YTD | 2.438 | -0.922 | -264% |
| Net Assets | 14.1B | 4.2M | 336,034% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.35 | 66% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 22.00 | 86% |
| Yield | 1.56 | 2.80 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWS | TMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMDV has been loosely correlated with GRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMDV jumps, then GRC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMDV | 100% | N/A | ||
| GRC - TMDV | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| SOLV - TMDV | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| LEG - TMDV | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.31% | ||
| CSL - TMDV | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHW - TMDV | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||