Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWR vs XMHQ
IWR vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts IWR vs XMHQ
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Price$93.72
Change+$0.55 (+0.59%)
Volume$888.78K
Net Assets43.01B
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$100.94
Change+$0.94 (+0.94%)
Volume$168.85K
Net Assets5.05B
IWR vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWR vs. XMHQ commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWR is a Buy and XMHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWR has more net assets: 43B vs. XMHQ (5.05B). IWR has a higher annual dividend yield than XMHQ: IWR (6.655) vs XMHQ (2.861). IWR was incepted earlier than XMHQ: IWR (24 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). IWR (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than XMHQ (0.25). XMHQ has a higher turnover IWR (9.00) vs IWR (9.00).
| IWR | XMHQ | IWR / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 6.655 | 2.861 | 233% |
| Net Assets | 43B | 5.05B | 852% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.25 | 76% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 62.00 | 15% |
| Yield | 1.33 | 0.67 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWR | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 27 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPFF | 9.11 | 0.13 | +1.49% |
| Global X SuperIncome™ Preferred ETF | |||
| FELG | 37.32 | 0.38 | +1.03% |
| Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | |||
| ETO | 27.54 | 0.16 | +0.58% |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Div Oppor Fund | |||
| DEEP | 34.56 | 0.17 | +0.49% |
| Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF | |||
| CPNQ | 25.46 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Dec | |||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 82% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| DCI - XMHQ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 81% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| VNT - XMHQ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| LECO - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
More | ||||