Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWR vs SCHM
IWR vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts IWR vs SCHM
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Price$93.72
Change+$0.55 (+0.59%)
Volume$888.78K
Net Assets42.56B
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$28.71
Change+$0.16 (+0.56%)
Volume$724.91K
Net Assets11.78B
IWR vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWR vs. SCHM commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWR is a Buy and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWR has more net assets: 42.6B vs. SCHM (11.8B). IWR has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: IWR (6.655) vs SCHM (4.284). IWR was incepted earlier than SCHM: IWR (24 years) vs SCHM (14 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWR (0.19). SCHM has a higher turnover IWR (9.00) vs IWR (9.00).
| IWR | SCHM | IWR / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 6.655 | 4.284 | 155% |
| Net Assets | 42.6B | 11.8B | 361% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.04 | 475% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 13.00 | 69% |
| Yield | 1.33 | 1.44 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWR | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||