Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWP vs QMOM
IWP vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts IWP vs QMOM
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$139.66
Change-$0.17 (-0.12%)
Volume$647.17K
Net Assets20.8B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$66.72
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
Volume$9.84K
Net Assets349.08M
IWP vs QMOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWP vs. QMOM commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWP is a Hold and QMOM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 20.8B vs. QMOM (349M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: IWP (10.477) vs QMOM (4.034). IWP was incepted earlier than QMOM: IWP (24 years) vs QMOM (10 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29).
| IWP | QMOM | IWP / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 10.477 | 4.034 | 260% |
| Net Assets | 20.8B | 349M | 5,960% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.29 | 79% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 0.34 | 1.38 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWP | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| ARES - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| KKR - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| APO - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||