Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWP vs QMOM
IWP vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts IWP vs QMOM
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$138.29
Change+$0.67 (+0.49%)
Volume$3.68K
Net Assets19.98B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$64.54
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
Volume$100
Net Assets342.21M
IWP vs QMOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWP vs. QMOM commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWP is a Buy and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 20B vs. QMOM (342M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: IWP (8.871) vs QMOM (0.781). IWP was incepted earlier than QMOM: IWP (24 years) vs QMOM (10 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover IWP (24.00) vs IWP (24.00).
| IWP | QMOM | IWP / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 8.871 | 0.781 | 1,136% |
| Net Assets | 20B | 342M | 5,848% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.29 | 79% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 363.00 | 7% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 1.38 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWP | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 21 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| ARES - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| KKR - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| APO - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
More | ||||