Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWP vs PJFM
IWP vs PJFM Comparison
Open Charts IWP vs PJFM
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$141.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Volume$3.03M
Net Assets20.62B
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
Price$60.17
Change-$0.83 (-1.36%)
Volume$162
Net Assets14.88M
IWP vs PJFM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWP vs. PJFM commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWP is a Hold and PJFM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 20.6B vs. PJFM (14.9M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than PJFM: IWP (11.695) vs PJFM (3.608). IWP was incepted earlier than PJFM: IWP (24 years) vs PJFM (2 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than PJFM (0.49). PJFM has a higher turnover IWP (24.00) vs IWP (24.00).
| IWP | PJFM | IWP / PJFM | |
| Gain YTD | 11.695 | 3.608 | 324% |
| Net Assets | 20.6B | 14.9M | 138,255% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.49 | 47% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 101.00 | 24% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 0.80 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWP | PJFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| ARES - IWP | 82% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| APO - IWP | 80% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| KKR - IWP | 80% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| OWL - IWP | 78% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| CPAY - IWP | 76% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
More | ||||
PJFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PJFM has been loosely correlated with WSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PJFM jumps, then WSC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PJFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PJFM | 100% | N/A | ||
| WSC - PJFM | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| WTFC - PJFM | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| ALSN - PJFM | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| CBRE - PJFM | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| RL - PJFM | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||