Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWN vs XMVM
IWN vs XMVM Comparison
Open Charts IWN vs XMVM
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Price$193.70
Change+$1.84 (+0.96%)
Volume$1.88K
Net Assets12.67B
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momt ETF
Price$65.79
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
Volume$756
Net Assets367.64M
IWN vs XMVM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWN vs. XMVM commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWN is a Hold and XMVM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWN has more net assets: 12.7B vs. XMVM (368M). IWN has a higher annual dividend yield than XMVM: IWN (5.877) vs XMVM (2.291). IWN was incepted earlier than XMVM: IWN (25 years) vs XMVM (21 years). IWN (0.24) has a lower expense ratio than XMVM (0.39). XMVM has a higher turnover IWN (28.00) vs IWN (28.00).
| IWN | XMVM | IWN / XMVM | |
| Gain YTD | 5.877 | 2.291 | 257% |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 368M | 3,451% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.24 | 0.39 | 62% |
| Turnover | 28.00 | 73.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 1.69 | 2.07 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWN | XMVM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWN has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWN jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWN | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| SSB - IWN | 85% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| UFPI - IWN | 80% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| TMHC - IWN | 68% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| CMC - IWN | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| CIVI - IWN | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
More | ||||
XMVM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMVM has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMVM jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMVM | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| FNB - XMVM | 91% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| WTFC - XMVM | 89% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| ONB - XMVM | 88% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| WBS - XMVM | 88% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| UMBF - XMVM | 88% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||