IWM | XJR | IWM / XJR | |
Gain YTD | 11.026 | 2.394 | 461% |
Net Assets | 68.4B | 103M | 66,408% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.12 | 158% |
Turnover | 18.00 | 27.00 | 67% |
Yield | 0.99 | 1.75 | 57% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
IWM | XJR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago87% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 9 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that XJR and BCC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XJR and BCC's prices will move in lockstep.