IWM | XJR | IWM / XJR | |
Gain YTD | 2.066 | -1.027 | -201% |
Net Assets | 65.6B | 99.7M | 65,797% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.12 | 158% |
Turnover | 18.00 | 27.00 | 67% |
Yield | 1.15 | 2.04 | 56% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
IWM | XJR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago86% | 5 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago85% | 7 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that XJR and ANF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XJR and ANF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XJR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
XJR | 100% | +0.40% | ||
ANF - XJR | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
MTH - XJR | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
SPSC - XJR | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
BCC - XJR | 0% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
ENSG - XJR | 0% Poorly correlated | +8.92% | ||
More |