| IWM | VTWO | IWM / VTWO | |
| Gain YTD | 7.633 | 7.627 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 76.8B | 14.5B | 530% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.07 | 271% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 14.00 | 129% |
| Yield | 0.98 | 1.19 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 15 years | - |
| IWM | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| POWR | 25.85 | 0.52 | +2.05% |
| iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | |||
| NFRA | 65.95 | 0.95 | +1.46% |
| FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infras ETF | |||
| JPUS | 135.40 | 0.66 | +0.49% |
| JPMorgan Diversified Return US Eq ETF | |||
| MVFD | 31.24 | 0.15 | +0.49% |
| Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF | |||
| IPOS | 19.33 | -0.10 | -0.50% |
| Renaissance International IPO ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| APG - IWM | 68% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| SSD - IWM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| LNWO - IWM | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| CVNA - IWM | 50% Loosely correlated | -7.05% | ||
| FIX - IWM | 46% Loosely correlated | +5.44% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTWO has been closely correlated with SSD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VTWO jumps, then SSD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTWO | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| SSD - VTWO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| FIX - VTWO | 49% Loosely correlated | +5.44% | ||
| LNWO - VTWO | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| ONTO - VTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| FN - VTWO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||