IWM | SCHA | IWM / SCHA | |
Gain YTD | 18.167 | 17.515 | 104% |
Net Assets | 79.5B | 19.4B | 410% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 18.00 | 9.00 | 200% |
Yield | 1.23 | 1.31 | 94% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
IWM | SCHA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago84% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA | 100% | -0.87% | ||
THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.62% | ||
CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +19.13% | ||
TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.24% | ||
More |