IWM | SCHA | IWM / SCHA | |
Gain YTD | -5.368 | -4.618 | 116% |
Net Assets | 62.8B | 16.8B | 374% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.04 | 475% |
Turnover | 17.00 | 11.00 | 155% |
Yield | 1.27 | 1.72 | 74% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
IWM | SCHA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago86% | 9 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 6 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA | 100% | +0.37% | ||
THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.96% | ||
CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
More |