| IWM | SCHA | IWM / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 12.313 | 9.499 | 130% |
| Net Assets | 68.1B | 18.9B | 360% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.04 | 475% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 11.00 | 164% |
| Yield | 0.98 | 1.41 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| IWM | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | 12 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
More | ||||