Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWM vs SCHA
IWM vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts IWM vs SCHA
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Price$269.79
Change+$2.00 (+0.75%)
Volume$35.11M
Net Assets78.01B
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$31.07
Change+$0.21 (+0.68%)
Volume$3.03M
Net Assets20.81B
IWM vs SCHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWM vs. SCHA commentary
Jan 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWM is a Buy and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWM has more net assets: 78B vs. SCHA (20.8B). IWM has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHA: IWM (9.599) vs SCHA (9.094). IWM was incepted earlier than SCHA: IWM (26 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWM (0.19). IWM has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| IWM | SCHA | IWM / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 9.599 | 9.094 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 78B | 20.8B | 375% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.04 | 475% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 11.00 | 164% |
| Yield | 1.04 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWM | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| APG - IWM | 68% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| SSD - IWM | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| LNWO - IWM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| CVNA - IWM | 50% Loosely correlated | +5.15% | ||
| FIX - IWM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||