Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWM vs PSC
IWM vs PSC Comparison
Open Charts IWM vs PSC
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Price$263.19
Change+$1.84 (+0.70%)
Volume$37.16M
Net Assets77B
Principal US Small Cap ETF
Price$60.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
Volume$400.13K
Net Assets1.66B
IWM vs PSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWM vs. PSC commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWM is a Hold and PSC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWM has more net assets: 77B vs. PSC (1.67B). IWM has a higher annual dividend yield than PSC: IWM (6.918) vs PSC (4.573). IWM was incepted earlier than PSC: IWM (26 years) vs PSC (9 years). IWM (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than PSC (0.38). PSC has a higher turnover IWM (18.00) vs IWM (18.00).
| IWM | PSC | IWM / PSC | |
| Gain YTD | 6.918 | 4.573 | 151% |
| Net Assets | 77B | 1.67B | 4,625% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.38 | 50% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 80.30 | 22% |
| Yield | 1.04 | 0.67 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWM | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | 100% | +0.70% | ||
| APG - IWM | 68% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| SSD - IWM | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| CVNA - IWM | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| FIX - IWM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| ONTO - IWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.42% | ||
More | ||||
PSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSC has been closely correlated with CADE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSC jumps, then CADE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSC | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| CADE - PSC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| ATKR - PSC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| FIX - PSC | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| JXN - PSC | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| PAGS - PSC | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
More | ||||