IWM | OSCV | IWM / OSCV | |
Gain YTD | 8.147 | 4.434 | 184% |
Net Assets | 66.9B | 652M | 10,261% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.80 | 24% |
Turnover | 18.00 | 25.00 | 72% |
Yield | 1.06 | 1.14 | 93% |
Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
IWM | OSCV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 13 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago85% | 6 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSCV has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OSCV jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSCV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OSCV | 100% | -0.13% | ||
WTFC - OSCV | 85% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
SBCF - OSCV | 82% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
HOMB - OSCV | 81% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
GGG - OSCV | 79% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
PRI - OSCV | 79% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More |