Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWM vs OSCV
IWM vs OSCV Comparison
Open Charts IWM vs OSCV
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Price$263.20
Change+$1.85 (+0.71%)
Volume$157.55K
Net Assets76.69B
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
Price$38.56
Change+$0.27 (+0.71%)
Volume$100
Net Assets658.51M
IWM vs OSCV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWM vs. OSCV commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWM is a Hold and OSCV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWM has more net assets: 76.7B vs. OSCV (659M). IWM has a higher annual dividend yield than OSCV: IWM (6.171) vs OSCV (3.403). IWM was incepted earlier than OSCV: IWM (26 years) vs OSCV (8 years). IWM (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than OSCV (0.79). OSCV has a higher turnover IWM (18.00) vs IWM (18.00).
| IWM | OSCV | IWM / OSCV | |
| Gain YTD | 6.171 | 3.403 | 181% |
| Net Assets | 76.7B | 659M | 11,639% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.79 | 24% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 25.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 1.04 | 1.23 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWM | OSCV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 83% | 15 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| APG - IWM | 68% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| SSD - IWM | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CVNA - IWM | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| FIX - IWM | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.37% | ||
| ONTO - IWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
More | ||||
OSCV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSCV has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OSCV jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSCV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSCV | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| WTFC - OSCV | 84% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| SBCF - OSCV | 81% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| HOMB - OSCV | 80% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| GGG - OSCV | 80% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| FELE - OSCV | 78% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
More | ||||