Intraday BUY SELL Signals
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWM vs ONTO
IWM vs ONTO Comparison
Open Charts IWM vs ONTO
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Price$263.19
Change+$1.84 (+0.70%)
Volume$37.16M
Net Assets77B
Onto Innovation
Price$202.21
Change+$4.77 (+2.42%)
Volume$921.92K
Capitalization10.04B
IWM vs ONTO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWM vs. ONTO commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWM is a Hold and ONTO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ONTO: Fundamental Ratings
ONTO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWM | ONTO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | 100% | +0.70% | ||
| APG - IWM | 68% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| SSD - IWM | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| CVNA - IWM | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| FIX - IWM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| ONTO - IWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.42% | ||
More | ||||
ONTO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONTO has been closely correlated with ASMIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONTO jumps, then ASMIY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONTO | 100% | +2.42% | ||
| ASMIY - ONTO | 70% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| CAMT - ONTO | 69% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| KLAC - ONTO | 69% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| LRCX - ONTO | 68% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| FORM - ONTO | 67% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||