Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SPUS
IWF vs SPUS Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SPUS
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$440.25
Change-$1.17 (-0.27%)
Volume$322
Net Assets114.89B
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
Price$46.42
Change+$0.15 (+0.32%)
Volume$441.41K
Net Assets1.52B
IWF vs SPUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SPUS commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and SPUS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 115B vs. SPUS (1.52B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than SPUS: IWF (10.143) vs SPUS (8.598). IWF was incepted earlier than SPUS: IWF (25 years) vs SPUS (6 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than SPUS (0.45). SPUS has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | SPUS | IWF / SPUS | |
| Gain YTD | 10.143 | 8.598 | 118% |
| Net Assets | 115B | 1.52B | 7,586% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.45 | 42% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 18.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.68 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 80% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
SPUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPUS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPUS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUS | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| AMZN - SPUS | 82% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| APH - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| MSFT - SPUS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| KEYS - SPUS | 73% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| CDNS - SPUS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||