Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SPUS
IWF vs SPUS Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SPUS
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$470.09
Change-$5.72 (-1.20%)
Volume$18.4K
Net Assets124.03B
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
Price$51.40
Change-$0.39 (-0.75%)
Volume$18.06K
Net Assets1.96B
IWF vs SPUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SPUS commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and SPUS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 124B vs. SPUS (1.96B). SPUS has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: SPUS (1.410) vs IWF (0.530). IWF was incepted earlier than SPUS: IWF (26 years) vs SPUS (6 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than SPUS (0.45). SPUS has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | SPUS | IWF / SPUS | |
| Gain YTD | 0.530 | 1.410 | 38% |
| Net Assets | 124B | 1.96B | 6,323% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.45 | 40% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 18.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.60 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 77% | 15 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FMF | 48.37 | 0.09 | +0.19% |
| First Trust Managed Future Strategy ETF | |||
| DAK | 27.10 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| Dakota Active Equity ETF | |||
| FLCV | 31.85 | -0.13 | -0.40% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| CGW | 64.06 | -0.32 | -0.50% |
| Invesco S&P Global Water ETF | |||
| FFLS | 23.76 | -0.17 | -0.73% |
| Future Fund Long/Short ETF | |||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -4.05% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
More | ||||
SPUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPUS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPUS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUS | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| AMZN - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| NVDA - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| PH - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| EMR - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| LRCX - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||