Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SPUS
IWF vs SPUS Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SPUS
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$470.07
Change-$10.01 (-2.09%)
Volume$10.05K
Net Assets125.56B
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
Price$50.42
Change-$0.91 (-1.77%)
Volume$17.89K
Net Assets1.83B
IWF vs SPUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SPUS commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and SPUS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 126B vs. SPUS (1.83B). SPUS (20.277) and IWF (19.903) have matching annual dividend yield . IWF was incepted earlier than SPUS: IWF (25 years) vs SPUS (6 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than SPUS (0.45). SPUS has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | SPUS | IWF / SPUS | |
| Gain YTD | 19.903 | 20.277 | 98% |
| Net Assets | 126B | 1.83B | 6,885% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.45 | 40% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 18.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.59 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
SPUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPUS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPUS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUS | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| AMZN - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| NVDA - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| PH - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| EMR - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| LRCX - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
More | ||||