Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SPUS
IWF vs SPUS Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SPUS
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$459.18
Change-$15.42 (-3.25%)
Volume$3.97M
Net Assets120.15B
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
Price$51.06
Change+$0.91 (+1.81%)
Volume$747.88K
Net Assets2B
IWF vs SPUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SPUS commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and SPUS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 120B vs. SPUS (2.01B). SPUS has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: SPUS (0.031) vs IWF (-2.983). IWF was incepted earlier than SPUS: IWF (26 years) vs SPUS (6 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than SPUS (0.45). SPUS has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | SPUS | IWF / SPUS | |
| Gain YTD | -2.983 | 0.031 | -9,580% |
| Net Assets | 120B | 2.01B | 5,985% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.45 | 40% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 18.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.59 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 8 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.78% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -8.46% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
More | ||||
SPUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPUS has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPUS jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUS | 100% | -1.22% | ||
| PH - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| NVDA - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| AMZN - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| LRCX - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| KLAC - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
More | ||||