Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SCHG
IWF vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SCHG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$436.02
Change+$1.76 (+0.41%)
Volume$100
Net Assets113.41B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$29.87
Change+$0.14 (+0.47%)
Volume$7.26K
Net Assets45.42B
IWF vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SCHG commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and SCHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 113B vs. SCHG (45.4B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: IWF (8.359) vs SCHG (6.925). IWF was incepted earlier than SCHG: IWF (25 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWF (0.19). IWF has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| IWF | SCHG | IWF / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 8.359 | 6.925 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 113B | 45.4B | 249% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.04 | 475% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 3.00 | 400% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.39 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 11 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| META - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||