Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SCHG
IWF vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SCHG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$470.07
Change-$10.01 (-2.09%)
Volume$10.05K
Net Assets125.56B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$32.24
Change-$0.76 (-2.30%)
Volume$54.04K
Net Assets52.72B
IWF vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SCHG commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 126B vs. SCHG (52.7B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: IWF (19.903) vs SCHG (18.756). IWF was incepted earlier than SCHG: IWF (25 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWF (0.18). IWF has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| IWF | SCHG | IWF / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 19.903 | 18.756 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 126B | 52.7B | 239% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.04 | 450% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 3.00 | 433% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.35 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 87% | 17 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| META - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||