Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SCHG
IWF vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SCHG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$407.57
Change+$4.01 (+0.99%)
Volume$991.19K
Net Assets106.8B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$28.09
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
Volume$7.2M
Net Assets42.04B
IWF vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SCHG commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 107B vs. SCHG (42B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: IWF (-0.701) vs SCHG (-1.190). IWF was incepted earlier than SCHG: IWF (25 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWF (0.19). IWF has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| IWF | SCHG | IWF / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | -0.701 | -1.190 | 59% |
| Net Assets | 107B | 42B | 255% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.04 | 475% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 3.00 | 400% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.41 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 73% | 12 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 87% | 12 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 87% | 21 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 80% | 19 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | 12 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -10.67% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -9.64% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| META - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -10.67% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
More | ||||