Ad is loading...
IWF vs SCHG
IWF vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SCHG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$399.23
Change-$0.39 (-0.10%)
Volume$21.33K
Net Assets105.37B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$27.50
Change-$0.09 (-0.33%)
Volume$10.05K
Net Assets40.58B
IWF vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SCHG commentary
May 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and SCHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 105B vs. SCHG (40.6B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: IWF (-0.382) vs SCHG (-0.903). IWF was incepted earlier than SCHG: IWF (25 years) vs SCHG (15 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWF (0.19). IWF has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| IWF | SCHG | IWF / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | -0.382 | -0.903 | 42% |
| Net Assets | 105B | 40.6B | 259% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.04 | 475% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 3.00 | 400% |
| Yield | 0.49 | 0.44 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 10 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| META - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||