Ad is loading...
IWF vs SCHG
IWF vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SCHG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$402.63
Change-$14.45 (-3.46%)
Volume$61.44K
CapitalizationN/A
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$27.95
Change-$1.02 (-3.52%)
Volume$47.58K
CapitalizationN/A
IWF vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SCHG commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 110B vs. SCHG (38.4B). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: SCHG (41.175) vs IWF (38.260). IWF was incepted earlier than SCHG: IWF (25 years) vs SCHG (15 years). IWF has a higher turnover SCHG (9.00) vs SCHG (9.00).
| IWF | SCHG | IWF / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 38.260 | 41.175 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 110B | 38.4B | 286% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 9.00 | 156% |
| Yield | 0.58 | 0.43 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| ANET - IWF | 72% Closely correlated | -3.07% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| ANET - SCHG | 72% Closely correlated | -3.07% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 71% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
More | ||||