Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs SCHG
IWF vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs SCHG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$470.99
Change+$5.92 (+1.27%)
Volume$483
Net Assets121.34B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$32.18
Change+$0.41 (+1.29%)
Volume$3.26K
Net Assets51.28B
IWF vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. SCHG commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 121B vs. SCHG (51.3B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: IWF (16.155) vs SCHG (14.330). IWF was incepted earlier than SCHG: IWF (25 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWF (0.18). IWF has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| IWF | SCHG | IWF / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 16.155 | 14.330 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 121B | 51.3B | 236% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.04 | 450% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 3.00 | 433% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.37 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 87% | 15 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| META - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||