Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QYLG
IWF vs QYLG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QYLG commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and QYLG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 122B vs. QYLG (134M). QYLG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: QYLG (1.043) vs IWF (-0.668). IWF was incepted earlier than QYLG: IWF (26 years) vs QYLG (5 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QYLG (0.35). QYLG has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | QYLG | IWF / QYLG | |
| Gain YTD | -0.668 | 1.043 | -64% |
| Net Assets | 122B | 134M | 91,045% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.35 | 51% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 14.82 | 88% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 7.02 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
QYLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QYLG has been loosely correlated with ARM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QYLG jumps, then ARM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QYLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLG | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| ARM - QYLG | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.64% | ||
| PLTR - QYLG | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| KLAC - QYLG | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| MSFT - QYLG | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| LRCX - QYLG | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.61% | ||
More | ||||