Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QTR
IWF vs QTR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QTR commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and QTR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 128B vs. QTR (3.29M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than QTR: IWF (20.001) vs QTR (12.097). IWF was incepted earlier than QTR: IWF (26 years) vs QTR (4 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QTR (0.25). IWF has a higher turnover QTR (5.84) vs QTR (5.84).
| IWF | QTR | IWF / QTR | |
| Gain YTD | 20.001 | 12.097 | 165% |
| Net Assets | 128B | 3.29M | 3,894,128% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.25 | 72% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 5.84 | 223% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.47 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QTR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 29 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||
QTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTR has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTR jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTR | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - QTR | 80% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| KLAC - QTR | 78% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| CDNS - QTR | 78% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| AMAT - QTR | 77% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| SNPS - QTR | 76% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||