Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QTR
IWF vs QTR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QTR commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and QTR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 120B vs. QTR (3.08M). QTR has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: QTR (0.527) vs IWF (-1.230). IWF was incepted earlier than QTR: IWF (26 years) vs QTR (4 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QTR (0.25). IWF has a higher turnover QTR (6.24) vs QTR (6.24).
| IWF | QTR | IWF / QTR | |
| Gain YTD | -1.230 | 0.527 | -233% |
| Net Assets | 120B | 3.08M | 3,891,051% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.25 | 72% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 6.24 | 208% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.46 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QTR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
More | ||||
QTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTR has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTR jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTR | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| LRCX - QTR | 80% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| KLAC - QTR | 78% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| CDNS - QTR | 78% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| AMAT - QTR | 77% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| SNPS - QTR | 76% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
More | ||||