Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QQH
IWF vs QQH Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs QQH
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$480.33
Change-$0.14 (-0.03%)
Volume$1.32M
Net Assets127.52B
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Price$79.05
Change-$0.11 (-0.14%)
Volume$11.06K
Net Assets692.35M
IWF vs QQH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QQH commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and QQH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 128B vs. QQH (692M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than QQH: IWF (19.966) vs QQH (17.932). IWF was incepted earlier than QQH: IWF (26 years) vs QQH (6 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QQH (0.98). QQH has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | QQH | IWF / QQH | |
| Gain YTD | 19.966 | 17.932 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 128B | 692M | 18,497% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.98 | 18% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 165.00 | 8% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.20 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||
QQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQH has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQH jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQH | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| AMZN - QQH | 74% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| NVDA - QQH | 72% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| LRCX - QQH | 70% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| KLAC - QQH | 70% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| MSFT - QQH | 69% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||