Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QQH
IWF vs QQH Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs QQH
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$469.92
Change-$10.16 (-2.12%)
Volume$1.12M
Net Assets122.83B
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Price$77.13
Change-$2.20 (-2.77%)
Volume$20.71K
Net Assets659.25M
IWF vs QQH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QQH commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and QQH is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 123B vs. QQH (659M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than QQH: IWF (19.903) vs QQH (18.350). IWF was incepted earlier than QQH: IWF (26 years) vs QQH (6 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QQH (1.02). QQH has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | QQH | IWF / QQH | |
| Gain YTD | 19.903 | 18.350 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 123B | 659M | 18,665% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 1.02 | 18% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 165.00 | 8% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.20 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 87% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
QQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQH has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQH jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQH | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| AMZN - QQH | 74% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| NVDA - QQH | 72% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| LRCX - QQH | 70% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| KLAC - QQH | 70% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| MSFT - QQH | 69% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||