Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QQH
IWF vs QQH Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs QQH
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$464.84
Change+$1.97 (+0.43%)
Volume$1.18M
Net Assets120.98B
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Price$75.58
Change+$0.42 (+0.56%)
Volume$13.08K
Net Assets646.28M
IWF vs QQH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QQH commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and QQH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 121B vs. QQH (646M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than QQH: IWF (16.097) vs QQH (12.755). IWF was incepted earlier than QQH: IWF (25 years) vs QQH (6 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QQH (1.02). QQH has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | QQH | IWF / QQH | |
| Gain YTD | 16.097 | 12.755 | 126% |
| Net Assets | 121B | 646M | 18,731% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 1.02 | 18% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 124.00 | 10% |
| Yield | 0.40 | 0.23 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||
QQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQH has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQH jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQH | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| AMZN - QQH | 73% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| NVDA - QQH | 72% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| MSFT - QQH | 70% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| LRCX - QQH | 68% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| META - QQH | 68% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
More | ||||