Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QOWZ
IWF vs QOWZ Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs QOWZ
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$480.35
Change-$0.12 (-0.02%)
Volume$3.52K
Net Assets127.51B
Invesco Nasdaq Free CA Flw Achiev ETF
Price$36.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.5M
IWF vs QOWZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QOWZ commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and QOWZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 128B vs. QOWZ (14.5M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than QOWZ: IWF (20.001) vs QOWZ (8.743). IWF was incepted earlier than QOWZ: IWF (26 years) vs QOWZ (2 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QOWZ (0.39). QOWZ has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | QOWZ | IWF / QOWZ | |
| Gain YTD | 20.001 | 8.743 | 229% |
| Net Assets | 128B | 14.5M | 882,759% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.39 | 46% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 36.00 | 36% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.30 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | 10 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||
QOWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QOWZ and MNRO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QOWZ and MNRO's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QOWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QOWZ | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| MNRO - QOWZ | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
| HRL - QOWZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| ADBE - QOWZ | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| FAST - QOWZ | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
| DLHC - QOWZ | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||