Ad is loading...
IWF vs QGRW
IWF vs QGRW Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs QGRW
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$399.42
Change+$2.75 (+0.69%)
Volume$16.57K
Net Assets105.37B
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Price$49.39
Change+$0.37 (+0.75%)
Volume$603
Net Assets1.29B
IWF vs QGRW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QGRW commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and QGRW is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 105B vs. QGRW (1.29B). QGRW has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: QGRW (-0.487) vs IWF (-1.117). IWF was incepted earlier than QGRW: IWF (25 years) vs QGRW (2 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than QGRW (0.28). QGRW has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | QGRW | IWF / QGRW | |
| Gain YTD | -1.117 | -0.487 | 229% |
| Net Assets | 105B | 1.29B | 8,152% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.28 | 68% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 27.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 0.49 | 0.16 | 312% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +1.52% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +3.65% | ||
More | ||||
QGRW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QGRW has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QGRW jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QGRW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGRW | 100% | +1.83% | ||
| APH - QGRW | 78% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| ARES - QGRW | 75% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| MSFT - QGRW | 72% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| CDNS - QGRW | 71% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| SNPS - QGRW | 69% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
More | ||||