Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QCLR
IWF vs QCLR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QCLR commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a StrongBuy and QCLR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 120B vs. QCLR (4.03M). QCLR has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: QCLR (0.192) vs IWF (-2.983). IWF was incepted earlier than QCLR: IWF (26 years) vs QCLR (4 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QCLR (0.25). IWF has a higher turnover QCLR (7.94) vs QCLR (7.94).
| IWF | QCLR | IWF / QCLR | |
| Gain YTD | -2.983 | 0.192 | -1,552% |
| Net Assets | 120B | 4.03M | 2,976,190% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.25 | 72% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 7.94 | 164% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.40 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 8 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.78% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -8.46% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
More | ||||
QCLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLR has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLR jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLR | 100% | -1.12% | ||
| LRCX - QCLR | 77% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| KLAC - QCLR | 75% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| AMAT - QCLR | 74% Closely correlated | -2.96% | ||
| CDNS - QCLR | 74% Closely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| ASML - QCLR | 73% Closely correlated | -3.16% | ||
More | ||||