Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs QCLR
IWF vs QCLR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. QCLR commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and QCLR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 121B vs. QCLR (3.23M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than QCLR: IWF (16.667) vs QCLR (10.213). IWF was incepted earlier than QCLR: IWF (25 years) vs QCLR (4 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than QCLR (0.25). IWF has a higher turnover QCLR (9.99) vs QCLR (9.99).
| IWF | QCLR | IWF / QCLR | |
| Gain YTD | 16.667 | 10.213 | 163% |
| Net Assets | 121B | 3.23M | 3,748,451% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.25 | 72% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 9.99 | 130% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.47 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | QCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 87% | 17 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||
QCLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLR has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLR jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLR | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - QCLR | 77% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| KLAC - QCLR | 75% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| AMAT - QCLR | 74% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| CDNS - QCLR | 74% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| ASML - QCLR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||