Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs PWB
IWF vs PWB Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs PWB
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$480.84
Change+$0.37 (+0.08%)
Volume$2.04K
Net Assets127.51B
Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF
Price$129.83
Change+$0.70 (+0.54%)
Volume$34.63K
Net Assets1.44B
IWF vs PWB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. PWB commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and PWB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 128B vs. PWB (1.44B). PWB has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: PWB (27.612) vs IWF (20.001). IWF was incepted earlier than PWB: IWF (26 years) vs PWB (21 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than PWB (0.55). PWB has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | PWB | IWF / PWB | |
| Gain YTD | 20.001 | 27.612 | 72% |
| Net Assets | 128B | 1.44B | 8,864% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.55 | 33% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 92.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.06 | 585% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | 10 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||
PWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWB has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWB jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWB | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| PH - PWB | 80% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| ETN - PWB | 78% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| AXP - PWB | 77% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - PWB | 75% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| LRCX - PWB | 75% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
More | ||||