Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs PWB
IWF vs PWB Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs PWB
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$470.69
Change+$0.56 (+0.12%)
Volume$11.32K
Net Assets122.46B
Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF
Price$132.78
Change+$0.87 (+0.66%)
Volume$185
Net Assets1.48B
IWF vs PWB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. PWB commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and PWB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 122B vs. PWB (1.48B). PWB has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: PWB (3.776) vs IWF (-0.668). IWF was incepted earlier than PWB: IWF (26 years) vs PWB (21 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than PWB (0.55). PWB has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | PWB | IWF / PWB | |
| Gain YTD | -0.668 | 3.776 | -18% |
| Net Assets | 122B | 1.48B | 8,238% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.55 | 33% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 92.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.00 | 23,266% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
PWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWB has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWB jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWB | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| PH - PWB | 80% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| ETN - PWB | 78% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| AXP - PWB | 77% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| LRCX - PWB | 76% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| AMZN - PWB | 75% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||