Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs PLDR
IWF vs PLDR Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs PLDR
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$421.70
Change+$2.38 (+0.57%)
Volume$1.37M
Net Assets110.99B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
Price$33.68
Change+$0.10 (+0.30%)
Volume$12.97K
Net Assets728.98M
IWF vs PLDR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. PLDR commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and PLDR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 111B vs. PLDR (729M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than PLDR: IWF (5.225) vs PLDR (1.024). IWF was incepted earlier than PLDR: IWF (25 years) vs PLDR (4 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than PLDR (0.60). PLDR has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | PLDR | IWF / PLDR | |
| Gain YTD | 5.225 | 1.024 | 510% |
| Net Assets | 111B | 729M | 15,226% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.60 | 32% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 32.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.40 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | PLDR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LFVCX | 26.61 | 0.19 | +0.72% |
| Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value C | |||
| GGOUX | 23.32 | 0.13 | +0.56% |
| Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth R6 | |||
| PEQSX | 36.70 | 0.14 | +0.38% |
| Putnam Large Cap Value R6 | |||
| NSGRX | 24.83 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| Northern Small Cap Core I | |||
| FKASX | 49.05 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap A | |||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||
PLDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLDR has been loosely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLDR jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLDR | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| TPG - PLDR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| CRH - PLDR | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| ADI - PLDR | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| STX - PLDR | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| VIK - PLDR | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
More | ||||