| IWF | MTUM | IWF / MTUM | |
| Gain YTD | 19.966 | 24.117 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 128B | 20.9B | 612% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.15 | 120% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 116.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.94 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| IWF | MTUM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CLSM | 23.87 | 0.05 | +0.22% |
| ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF | |||
| GVIP | 156.68 | 0.10 | +0.06% |
| Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | |||
| CPII | 18.95 | N/A | N/A |
| American Beacon Ionic Inflation Prot ETF | |||
| NEA | 11.55 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
| Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| OPTZ | 36.71 | -0.10 | -0.27% |
| Optimize Strategy Index ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTUM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTUM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUM | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| GS - MTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| MS - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| PH - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| KKR - MTUM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| APO - MTUM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||