| IWF | MTUM | IWF / MTUM | |
| Gain YTD | -2.983 | 2.453 | -122% |
| Net Assets | 120B | 21.3B | 563% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.15 | 120% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 116.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.89 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| IWF | MTUM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 22 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HYSD | 20.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF | |||
| PFIG | 24.25 | N/A | -0.01% |
| Invesco Fdmtl Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF | |||
| EAOK | 27.70 | -0.12 | -0.42% |
| iShares ESG Aware 30/70 Cnsrv Allc ETF | |||
| CALF | 45.34 | -0.48 | -1.05% |
| Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | |||
| EZBC | 44.19 | -0.91 | -2.02% |
| Franklin Bitcoin ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.78% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -8.46% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTUM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTUM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUM | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| GS - MTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| ARES - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | -10.15% | ||
| PH - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| MS - MTUM | 80% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| KKR - MTUM | 79% Closely correlated | -9.69% | ||
More | ||||