Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs MILN
IWF vs MILN Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs MILN
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$480.84
Change+$0.37 (+0.08%)
Volume$2.04K
Net Assets127.51B
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF
Price$47.40
Change+$0.29 (+0.62%)
Volume$3.43K
Net Assets111.89M
IWF vs MILN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. MILN commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and MILN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 128B vs. MILN (112M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than MILN: IWF (20.001) vs MILN (5.468). IWF was incepted earlier than MILN: IWF (26 years) vs MILN (10 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than MILN (0.50). IWF has a higher turnover MILN (10.95) vs MILN (10.95).
| IWF | MILN | IWF / MILN | |
| Gain YTD | 20.001 | 5.468 | 366% |
| Net Assets | 128B | 112M | 114,286% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.50 | 36% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 10.95 | 119% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.22 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | MILN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 16 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | 12 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||
MILN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MILN has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MILN jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MILN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MILN | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| META - MILN | 74% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| AMZN - MILN | 74% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CVNA - MILN | 70% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| AAPL - MILN | 70% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| SOFI - MILN | 70% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||