Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs MBCC
IWF vs MBCC Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs MBCC
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$428.27
Change+$4.75 (+1.12%)
Volume$567.68K
Net Assets112.55B
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
Price$36.99
Change+$0.30 (+0.82%)
Volume$3.75K
Net Assets121.15M
IWF vs MBCC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. MBCC commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and MBCC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 113B vs. MBCC (121M). MBCC has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: MBCC (7.481) vs IWF (6.864). IWF was incepted earlier than MBCC: IWF (25 years) vs MBCC (4 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than MBCC (1.25). MBCC has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| IWF | MBCC | IWF / MBCC | |
| Gain YTD | 6.864 | 7.481 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 113B | 121M | 93,388% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 1.25 | 15% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 75.00 | 16% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.14 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | MBCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||
MBCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBCC has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBCC jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBCC | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| BLK - MBCC | 77% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| META - MBCC | 74% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| TXN - MBCC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| SPG - MBCC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| DHR - MBCC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||