Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs MBCC
IWF vs MBCC Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs MBCC
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$467.12
Change+$2.35 (+0.51%)
Volume$3.09M
Net Assets120.73B
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
Price$36.69
Change+$0.11 (+0.30%)
Volume$18.42K
Net Assets124.42M
IWF vs MBCC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. MBCC commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and MBCC is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 121B vs. MBCC (124M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than MBCC: IWF (16.667) vs MBCC (6.684). IWF was incepted earlier than MBCC: IWF (25 years) vs MBCC (5 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than MBCC (1.14). MBCC has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | MBCC | IWF / MBCC | |
| Gain YTD | 16.667 | 6.684 | 249% |
| Net Assets | 121B | 124M | 97,581% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 1.14 | 16% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 75.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.20 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | MBCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 24 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||
MBCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MBCC and HD have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBCC and HD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBCC | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| HD - MBCC | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| GOOGL - MBCC | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| V - MBCC | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
| SO - MBCC | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
| TJX - MBCC | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||