Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs MBCC
IWF vs MBCC Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs MBCC
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$464.74
Change+$1.87 (+0.40%)
Volume$31.11K
Net Assets121.12B
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
Price$36.61
Change+$0.11 (+0.30%)
Volume$800
Net Assets145.4M
IWF vs MBCC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. MBCC commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a StrongBuy and MBCC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 121B vs. MBCC (145M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than MBCC: IWF (15.605) vs MBCC (6.385). IWF was incepted earlier than MBCC: IWF (25 years) vs MBCC (5 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than MBCC (1.14). MBCC has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | MBCC | IWF / MBCC | |
| Gain YTD | 15.605 | 6.385 | 244% |
| Net Assets | 121B | 145M | 83,448% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 1.14 | 16% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 75.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.40 | 0.14 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | MBCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | +4.08% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||
MBCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MBCC and V have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBCC and V's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBCC | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| V - MBCC | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| PEP - MBCC | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| ALL - MBCC | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.41% | ||
| AMT - MBCC | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| ACN - MBCC | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.76% | ||
More | ||||