Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs LSGR
IWF vs LSGR Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs LSGR
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$470.69
Change+$0.56 (+0.12%)
Volume$11.32K
Net Assets122.46B
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF
Price$44.21
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
Volume$100
Net Assets616.59M
IWF vs LSGR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. LSGR commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and LSGR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 122B vs. LSGR (617M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than LSGR: IWF (-0.668) vs LSGR (-1.184). IWF was incepted earlier than LSGR: IWF (26 years) vs LSGR (3 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than LSGR (0.59). IWF has a higher turnover LSGR (5.00) vs LSGR (5.00).
| IWF | LSGR | IWF / LSGR | |
| Gain YTD | -0.668 | -1.184 | 56% |
| Net Assets | 122B | 617M | 19,773% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.59 | 31% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 5.00 | 260% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.05 | 790% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | LSGR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
LSGR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSGR has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSGR jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSGR | 100% | -1.49% | ||
| NVDA - LSGR | 74% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| AMZN - LSGR | 72% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| META - LSGR | 71% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| MSFT - LSGR | 69% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| TSLA - LSGR | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
More | ||||