15 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
IWF vs LRCX
IWF vs LRCX Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs LRCX
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$322.08
Change-$3.95 (-1.21%)
Volume$5.4K
Net Assets86.62B
Lam Research
Price$60.70
Change-$1.51 (-2.43%)
Volume$10.02K
Capitalization127.38B
IWF vs LRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. LRCX commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and LRCX is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRCX: Fundamental Ratings
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +5.26% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +5.26% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 92% Closely correlated | +4.65% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 92% Closely correlated | +4.87% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 82% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| ENTG - LRCX | 81% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| QCOM - LRCX | 77% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||