Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs LCLG
IWF vs LCLG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs LCLG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$435.43
Change+$1.16 (+0.27%)
Volume$3.06K
Net Assets113.41B
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Gr ETF
Price$57.42
Change+$0.30 (+0.53%)
Volume$175
Net Assets82.83M
IWF vs LCLG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. LCLG commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and LCLG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 113B vs. LCLG (82.8M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than LCLG: IWF (8.359) vs LCLG (7.372). IWF was incepted earlier than LCLG: IWF (25 years) vs LCLG (13 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than LCLG (0.96). IWF has a higher turnover LCLG (5.00) vs LCLG (5.00).
| IWF | LCLG | IWF / LCLG | |
| Gain YTD | 8.359 | 7.372 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 113B | 82.8M | 136,473% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.96 | 20% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 5.00 | 240% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.05 | 772% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | LCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 25 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||
LCLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCLG has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCLG jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCLG | 100% | N/A | ||
| APH - LCLG | 74% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| KLAC - LCLG | 72% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| AVGO - LCLG | 70% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| NDSN - LCLG | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| URI - LCLG | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||