Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs LCLG
IWF vs LCLG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs LCLG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$471.07
Change+$1.15 (+0.24%)
Volume$2.64K
Net Assets122.83B
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Gr ETF
Price$62.73
Change-$0.09 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.5M
IWF vs LCLG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. LCLG commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and LCLG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 123B vs. LCLG (92.5M). LCLG (18.091) and IWF (17.366) have matching annual dividend yield . IWF was incepted earlier than LCLG: IWF (26 years) vs LCLG (13 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than LCLG (0.90). IWF has a higher turnover LCLG (5.00) vs LCLG (5.00).
| IWF | LCLG | IWF / LCLG | |
| Gain YTD | 17.366 | 18.091 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 123B | 92.5M | 132,973% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.90 | 20% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 5.00 | 260% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.05 | 717% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | LCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 87% | 22 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -2.12% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
More | ||||
LCLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCLG has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCLG jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCLG | 100% | N/A | ||
| APH - LCLG | 74% Closely correlated | -4.70% | ||
| KLAC - LCLG | 72% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| AVGO - LCLG | 70% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| NDSN - LCLG | 67% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| URI - LCLG | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||