Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWF vs LCG
IWF vs LCG Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs LCG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$469.92
Change-$10.16 (-2.12%)
Volume$1.12M
Net Assets122.83B
Sterling Capital Focus Equity ETF
Price$33.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$2.5K
Net Assets17.39M
IWF vs LCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. LCG commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Hold and LCG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 123B vs. LCG (17.4M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than LCG: IWF (19.903) vs LCG (11.474). IWF was incepted earlier than LCG: IWF (26 years) vs LCG (5 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than LCG (0.59). LCG has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| IWF | LCG | IWF / LCG | |
| Gain YTD | 19.903 | 11.474 | 173% |
| Net Assets | 123B | 17.4M | 706,897% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.59 | 31% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 21.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | LCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 87% | 19 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
LCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCG has been loosely correlated with ADYEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LCG jumps, then ADYEY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCG | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| ADYEY - LCG | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| CWST - LCG | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| MCO - LCG | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| TWLO - LCG | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.69% | ||
| U - LCG | 16% Poorly correlated | -3.38% | ||
More | ||||