Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWC vs SCHA
IWC vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts IWC vs SCHA
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
Price$162.70
Change+$1.31 (+0.81%)
Volume$2.22K
Net Assets1.13B
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$29.20
Change+$0.40 (+1.39%)
Volume$4.04M
Net Assets19.76B
IWC vs SCHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWC vs. SCHA commentary
Jan 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWC is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 19.8B vs. IWC (1.13B). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than IWC: SCHA (1.124) vs IWC (0.634). IWC was incepted earlier than SCHA: IWC (20 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IWC (0.60). IWC has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| IWC | SCHA | IWC / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 0.634 | 1.124 | 56% |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 19.8B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 28.00 | 11.00 | 255% |
| Yield | 1.10 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWC | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 88% | 16 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWC has been loosely correlated with RNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWC jumps, then RNA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWC | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| RNA - IWC | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| CLSK - IWC | 41% Loosely correlated | +14.13% | ||
| MOD - IWC | 40% Loosely correlated | +5.47% | ||
| RYTM - IWC | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| UFPT - IWC | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +7.54% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +3.23% | ||
More | ||||