Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWC vs IWM
IWC vs IWM Comparison
Open Charts IWC vs IWM
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
Price$162.70
Change+$1.31 (+0.81%)
Volume$2.22K
Net Assets1.13B
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Price$256.08
Change+$3.35 (+1.33%)
Volume$280.13K
Net Assets74.38B
IWC vs IWM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWC vs. IWM commentary
Jan 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWC is a Hold and IWM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWM has more net assets: 74.4B vs. IWC (1.13B). IWM has a higher annual dividend yield than IWC: IWM (1.064) vs IWC (0.634). IWC was incepted earlier than IWM: IWC (20 years) vs IWM (26 years). IWM (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than IWC (0.60). IWC has a higher turnover IWM (18.00) vs IWM (18.00).
| IWC | IWM | IWC / IWM | |
| Gain YTD | 0.634 | 1.064 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 74.4B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.19 | 316% |
| Turnover | 28.00 | 18.00 | 156% |
| Yield | 1.10 | 1.04 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWC | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 88% | 16 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWC has been loosely correlated with RNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWC jumps, then RNA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWC | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| RNA - IWC | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| CLSK - IWC | 41% Loosely correlated | +14.13% | ||
| MOD - IWC | 40% Loosely correlated | +5.47% | ||
| RYTM - IWC | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| UFPT - IWC | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||
IWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| APG - IWM | 68% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| SSD - IWM | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| CVNA - IWM | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.16% | ||
| FIX - IWM | 46% Loosely correlated | +7.54% | ||
| ONTO - IWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +5.07% | ||
More | ||||