IVZ
Price
$21.12
Change
-$0.22 (-1.03%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.42B
71 days until earnings call
NOAH
Price
$11.80
Change
-$0.15 (-1.26%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
780.74M
14 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVZ vs NOAH

Header iconIVZ vs NOAH Comparison
Open Charts IVZ vs NOAHBanner chart's image
Inves
Price$21.12
Change-$0.22 (-1.03%)
Volume$4.02M
Capitalization9.42B
Noah Holdings
Price$11.80
Change-$0.15 (-1.26%)
Volume$125.02K
Capitalization780.74M
IVZ vs NOAH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IVZ vs. NOAH commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVZ is a Hold and NOAH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (IVZ: $21.12 vs. NOAH: $11.80)
Brand notoriety: IVZ and NOAH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IVZ: 65% vs. NOAH: 87%
Market capitalization -- IVZ: $9.42B vs. NOAH: $780.74M
IVZ [@Investment Managers] is valued at $9.42B. NOAH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $780.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IVZ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNOAH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IVZ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NOAH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVZ is a better buy in the long-term than NOAH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IVZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOAH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IVZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NOAH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOAH is a better buy in the short-term than IVZ.

Price Growth

IVZ (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.93% price change this week, while NOAH (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

IVZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

NOAH is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.10% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVZ($9.42B) has a higher market cap than NOAH($781M). IVZ has higher P/E ratio than NOAH: IVZ (22.71) vs NOAH (12.14). NOAH YTD gains are higher at: 30.856 vs. IVZ (25.066).
IVZNOAHIVZ / NOAH
Capitalization9.42B781M1,206%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.06630.85681%
P/E Ratio22.7112.14187%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt965MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IVZ vs NOAH: Fundamental Ratings
IVZ
NOAH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45100
SMR RATING
1..100
8685
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
186
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVZ's Valuation (18) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOAH (93) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that IVZ’s stock grew significantly faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOAH (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that IVZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

NOAH's SMR Rating (85) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as IVZ (86) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that NOAH’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOAH (39) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that IVZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

NOAH's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as IVZ (18) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that NOAH’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVZNOAH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFJAX34.54-0.07
-0.20%
Calvert US Large Cap Value Rspnb Idx A
WAGOX4.34-0.01
-0.23%
Wasatch Global Opportunities Investor
FCIGX34.06-0.12
-0.35%
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth I
CIDVX21.37-0.08
-0.37%
Calamos Dividend Growth I
AUICX34.64-0.20
-0.57%
AB Equity Income C

IVZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVZ has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVZ jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVZ
1D Price
Change %
IVZ100%
-1.03%
JHG - IVZ
79%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
CG - IVZ
74%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
STEP - IVZ
69%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
TPG - IVZ
68%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
APO - IVZ
67%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
More

NOAH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOAH has been loosely correlated with TPVG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOAH jumps, then TPVG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOAH
1D Price
Change %
NOAH100%
-1.26%
TPVG - NOAH
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
IVZ - NOAH
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
PIAC - NOAH
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BN - NOAH
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSSS - NOAH
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
More