Ad is loading...
IVW vs SCHG
IVW vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts IVW vs SCHG
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Price$88.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.09%)
Volume$1.47M
Net Assets48.23B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$23.69
Change-$0.12 (-0.50%)
Volume$9.72M
Net Assets33.63B
IVW vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IVW vs. SCHG commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVW is a Hold and SCHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVW has more net assets: 48.2B vs. SCHG (33.6B). IVW has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: IVW (-12.774) vs SCHG (-14.911). IVW was incepted earlier than SCHG: IVW (25 years) vs SCHG (15 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than IVW (0.18). IVW has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| IVW | SCHG | IVW / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | -12.774 | -14.911 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 48.2B | 33.6B | 143% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.04 | 450% |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 3.00 | 1,033% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 0.45 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IVW | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 78% | 15 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IVW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVW has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVW jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVW | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| LRCX - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| MPWR - IVW | 75% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| META - IVW | 75% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| CDNS - IVW | 74% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| MSFT - IVW | 73% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 74% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| META - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||