Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IVW vs MBCC
IVW vs MBCC Comparison
Open Charts IVW vs MBCC
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Price$115.99
Change-$0.11 (-0.09%)
Volume$2.48M
Net Assets63.8B
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
Price$36.44
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
Volume$7.1K
Net Assets144.96M
IVW vs MBCC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IVW vs. MBCC commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVW is a StrongBuy and MBCC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVW has more net assets: 63.8B vs. MBCC (145M). IVW has a higher annual dividend yield than MBCC: IVW (14.501) vs MBCC (5.891). IVW was incepted earlier than MBCC: IVW (25 years) vs MBCC (4 years). IVW (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than MBCC (1.14). MBCC has a higher turnover IVW (31.00) vs IVW (31.00).
| IVW | MBCC | IVW / MBCC | |
| Gain YTD | 14.501 | 5.891 | 246% |
| Net Assets | 63.8B | 145M | 44,000% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 1.14 | 16% |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 75.00 | 41% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 0.14 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IVW | MBCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IVW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVW | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| NVDA - IVW | 82% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| AMZN - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| ETN - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| PH - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| META - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||
MBCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MBCC and V have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBCC and V's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBCC | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| V - MBCC | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
| PEP - MBCC | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
| ALL - MBCC | 12% Poorly correlated | -3.26% | ||
| MCD - MBCC | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
| AMT - MBCC | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.66% | ||
More | ||||