IVSBF
Price
$30.09
Change
-$0.29 (-0.95%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
62.33B
LGGNF
Price
$3.40
Change
-$0.10 (-2.86%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
17.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVSBF vs LGGNF

Header iconIVSBF vs LGGNF Comparison
Open Charts IVSBF vs LGGNFBanner chart's image
Investors AB
Price$30.09
Change-$0.29 (-0.95%)
Volume$1.38K
Capitalization62.33B
Legal & General Group
Price$3.40
Change-$0.10 (-2.86%)
Volume$4.27K
Capitalization17.93B
IVSBF vs LGGNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IVSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IVSBF vs. LGGNF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVSBF is a StrongBuy and LGGNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (IVSBF: $30.08 vs. LGGNF: $3.40)
Brand notoriety: IVSBF and LGGNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IVSBF: 23% vs. LGGNF: 54%
Market capitalization -- IVSBF: $62.33B vs. LGGNF: $17.93B
IVSBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.33B. LGGNF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $17.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IVSBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLGGNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IVSBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LGGNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVSBF is a better buy in the long-term than LGGNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IVSBF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGGNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IVSBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LGGNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVSBF is a better buy in the short-term than LGGNF.

Price Growth

IVSBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while LGGNF (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVSBF($62.3B) has a higher market cap than LGGNF($17.9B). LGGNF has higher P/E ratio than IVSBF: LGGNF (6.20) vs IVSBF (4.72). LGGNF YTD gains are higher at: 20.141 vs. IVSBF (14.283). LGGNF has more cash in the bank: 36.6B vs. IVSBF (10.4B). LGGNF has less debt than IVSBF: LGGNF (5.56B) vs IVSBF (96.1B). IVSBF has higher revenues than LGGNF: IVSBF (189B) vs LGGNF (-89.29B).
IVSBFLGGNFIVSBF / LGGNF
Capitalization62.3B17.9B348%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.28320.14171%
P/E Ratio4.726.2076%
Revenue189B-89.29B-212%
Total Cash10.4B36.6B28%
Total Debt96.1B5.56B1,729%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IVSBF vs LGGNF: Fundamental Ratings
IVSBF
LGGNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3379
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSBF (39). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to IVSBF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGGNF (79). This means that IVSBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as IVSBF (100). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to IVSBF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSBF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNF (55). This means that IVSBF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

IVSBF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNF (5). This means that IVSBF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVSBFLGGNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMAC5.050.17
+3.48%
DiaMedica Therapeutics
AKTX1.120.02
+1.82%
Akari Therapeutics plc
SAN8.970.09
+1.01%
Banco Santander SA
FSS108.780.39
+0.36%
Federal Signal Corp
ARLO16.23-0.18
-1.10%
Arlo Technologies

IVSBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IVSBF and TGOPY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IVSBF and TGOPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVSBF
1D Price
Change %
IVSBF100%
-0.93%
TGOPY - IVSBF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
HALFF - IVSBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - IVSBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
JBAXY - IVSBF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
IGIFF - IVSBF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
More

LGGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGGNF and LGGNY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGGNF and LGGNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNF
1D Price
Change %
LGGNF100%
-2.86%
LGGNY - LGGNF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
IGIFF - LGGNF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
IVSBF - LGGNF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
JBAXY - LGGNF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
IDKFF - LGGNF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.02%
More